Таблица оценивания конкурса QNSCC: различия между версиями
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
http://letopisi.org/index.php/>Евгений Патаракин |
Patarakin (обсуждение | вклад) м (1 версия импортирована) |
(нет различий)
|
Текущая версия на 11:44, 13 мая 2019
Пример оценивания, критери которого могут относиться к проекту независимо от среды, в которой он выполнен. Это мог быть Scratch, а мог быть обычный html
Критерий | Высокий уровень (7 8 9 10) | Средний уровень(4 5 6) | Низкий уровень (1 2 3 4) |
---|---|---|---|
Engagement | delivers an immersive experience that is likely to attract repeat users | competently attracts and engages user's interest | Offers limited engagement |
Artworks | detailed, creative and visually stunning artwork that enhances and complements the project | multiple concept with competent execution | single or basic concept |
Creativity | highly original, innovative and shows creative thinking | product differentiation present in concept and execution | Little evidence of novelty or innovation |
Digital media | use of multiple media types that adds to user experience. | additional media types used (e.g. image, audio, video) | No alternative media types used e.g. audio, image and limited animation |
Coding | well commented code demonstrating many programming constructs, algorithms and problem solving | Original project or significant enhancements to existing project. well commented | minor undocumented enhancements to existing project |
Good Logic | The programming options used make sense, work reliably, and are very relevant in terms of their use. | The programming options used are effective and clearly formulated | Insufficient efficiency in the programming options used. |
Completeness | Only minor bugs found. clear and concise instructions. evidence of testing | Some bugs found. good user instructions | Many serious bugs encountred. no user instructions |
Levels | (7 8 9 10) | (4 5 6) | (1 2 3) |